AI SEO
Auspia: what it does, what it costs
Picks the topic, writes the post, publishes it to your CMS, then watches what it did.
Auspia at a glance
Every row is a verified field or an honest absence. A row is dropped rather than filled with an em dash, so the length of this table says how complete the record is.
| What it is | Picks the topic, writes the post, publishes it to your CMS, then watches what it did. |
|---|---|
| Category | AI SEO |
| Best suited for | You run a small B2B SaaS or product site with no writer and no SEO hire, and nothing is currently being published |
| Starting price | Free plan (300 one-time credits); Starter $99/month |
| Free plan | Yes |
| Free trial | 3 days on Starter |
| Main strength | The full loop genuinely runs end to end, from topic through publishing to measurement, with no export step |
| Main limitation | Billing is in credits and the vendor publishes no credits-per-article rate, so the advertised 30-plus posts a month cannot be reconciled with the 8,000-credit Starter allowance from anything on the pricing page |
| Evidence | Primary-source researched |
| Closest alternatives | ClickRank, WordRocket, Alli AI, Surfer |
| Pricing checked | 9 September 2026 |
| Record checked | 9 September 2026 |
What Auspia is
Auspia is an autonomous SEO content engine built by Felo Inc., the Tokyo company behind the Felo AI search product. You connect a domain and a CMS, and it runs the whole loop on a schedule: picks the next topic from search demand and competitor signals, writes a complete article, publishes it to WordPress, Webflow, Shopify, Ghost, Sanity or a configured API endpoint, then tracks indexing, rankings and clicks through Search Console and feeds that back into the queue.
The pitch is the absence of a queue rather than a better draft. Most tools in this class stop at a document you still have to move somewhere. Auspia's five stages, opportunity discovery, brand context, content creation, CMS publishing and growth measurement, are designed to run without you, and the vendor puts the daily human cost at about one minute to approve the next topic.
That design is also what to weigh it against. Publishing 30-plus AI-written posts a month with a one-minute approval step is exactly the volume Google's scaled content abuse policy was written for, and the safeguard is whatever review you impose yourself. Billing is in credits with no published credits-per-article rate, so the cost of the advertised output cannot be worked out from the pricing page.
Auspia in context
Auspia is the most complete version of the “SEO on autopilot” pitch currently on sale: not a writer, not a dashboard, but a loop that picks the topic, writes the page, pushes it live on your CMS and then watches Search Console to decide what to do next. Six named CMS connectors and a configurable API path is genuinely wider coverage than the WordPress-only competition, and one flat $99 tier suits the small teams it is aimed at.
Two things on the vendor’s own pages should shape how you evaluate it.
The first is the credit model. Starter gives 8,000 credits a month and the home page advertises 30-plus published posts a month, but no page states what an article costs in credits. Those two numbers cannot be reconciled from anything published, and the answer decides whether $99 buys the advertised output or a fraction of it. Ask before subscribing.
The second is the evidence around the product. The pricing page serves Product structured data claiming a 4.8 rating from 2,187 ratings, while no rated reviews appear anywhere on the site. The testimonials are attributed to job titles rather than people. The logo strip leads with Felo’s own products. None of that says the software is bad, and none of it has been tested here, but it does mean the marketing offers nothing independent to check, so an evaluation has to start with the free plan rather than with the sales pages.
This listing is desk research. Nobody here has run the product, so there is no verdict on output quality.
What you can use it for
- Run a publishing programme on a small team with no writer, editor or SEO hire
- Publish AI-written posts straight into WordPress, Webflow, Shopify or Ghost without a copy-paste step
- Keep topic selection tied to product positioning rather than to raw keyword volume
- Watch every published post from indexing through to clicks without opening a second tool
The features that matter for SEO
Each one says what it does and the SEO job it serves. A vendor feature list without that second half tells you nothing you could not read on their own site.
Daily opportunity discovery
Picks the next topic each day from keyword demand, competitor signals and your own product positioning.
Topic selection is where most small-team programmes stall, and tying it to product positioning is what separates this from a keyword list sorted by volume.
The vendor does not publish which keyword or SERP data source sits behind it.
Brand context layer
Holds product facts, audience, site evidence, competitors and brand voice, and attaches them to every brief.
The mechanism that is supposed to stop the output reading as generic AI content, which is the failure mode of everything else in this class.
Article generation from the brief
Turns an approved opportunity into a complete article, with the brief staying linked through editing and review.
Keeping brief and draft attached is what lets a later performance signal be traced back to the decision that produced the page.
No published word-count range, model disclosure or sample output anywhere on the marketing site.
CMS publishing
Publishes reviewed work to WordPress, Webflow, Shopify, Ghost, Sanity, Emdash or a configurable API path.
The step that makes this an operator rather than a drafting tool. Six named CMS connectors plus an API path is wider coverage than most competitors offer.
The vendor states that provider availability depends on the connection, its configuration, account state and the permissions granted.
Search Console performance tracking
Follows each published URL from indexing through rankings to clicks, and can run authorised post-publish Search Console workflows.
Closes the loop the vendor sells. Winning topics get expanded and weak ones replaced from measured performance rather than from a guess.
The vendor states URL submission does not guarantee indexing.
Technical signal monitoring
Flags indexing problems, canonical issues, schema gaps and dead links on the tracked site.
Catches the problems that stop new content ranking at all, which matters more on a site publishing 30-plus pages a month than on one publishing four.
Positioned as monitoring alongside publishing, not as a full site crawler. No crawl budget or page limit is published.
AI search and GEO tooling
Bundles AI search visibility, GEO scoring, agent readiness and a one-page citation audit, several of them as free logged-out checkers.
Covers the second surface a publishing programme now has to earn, without a separate AI-visibility subscription.
The solution page does not name which assistants are monitored, so there is no way to tell what coverage the tracking has.
Auspia SEO Inspector extension
Shows page SEO and AI search visibility signals in the browser, free on Chrome, Edge and Firefox.
A no-account way to see what the platform reads from a page before committing a domain to it.
Pricing and limits
Starting price: Free plan (300 one-time credits); Starter $99/month Checked 9 September 2026 Vendor’s own pricing page
| Plan | Price | What it includes |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 /mo |
|
| Starter | $99 /mo | Runs pause when the credit balance is exhausted, until the next period refills it or a credit pack is bought.
|
| Permanent credit packs Add-on | Not published | Sold from an "Add credits" tab on the pricing page and from billing settings, and not reset by the billing period. The tab renders nothing without a session, so no pack prices were visible on the public page on 9 September 2026. |
Add-on rows are only ever charged on top of a plan, so they are excluded from the entry price used in the directory’s price filter.
Strengths and limitations
Strengths
- The full loop genuinely runs end to end, from topic through publishing to measurement, with no export step
- Six named CMS connectors plus a configurable API path, wider than most tools that stop at WordPress
- Brand context is a first-class stage rather than a tone setting bolted onto a prompt
- One flat $99 tier with no seat maths, on a product aimed at teams that cannot staff SEO
- A real free plan and a set of free logged-out checkers, so the output can be sampled before paying
- The product pages state their own limits plainly, including that indexing and AI citation are not guaranteed
Limitations
- Billing is in credits and the vendor publishes no credits-per-article rate, so the advertised 30-plus posts a month cannot be reconciled with the 8,000-credit Starter allowance from anything on the pricing page
- The pricing page emits Product structured data with an AggregateRating of 4.8 from 2,187 ratings, and no rated reviews appear anywhere on the site to support that number
- Testimonials are attributed to roles rather than people, "B2B SaaS founder" and "Head of growth", and the home page logo strip leads with Felo's own products rather than named customers
- The Starter plan card reads "No payment method required" while the FAQ directly below it says a payment method is taken at checkout for the 3-day trial
- Publishing 30-plus AI-written posts a month behind a one-minute approval is the risk profile Google's scaled content abuse policy targets, and the review gate is whatever you impose
- One paid tier and nothing above it. No seats, no client workspaces and no published site limit, so there is nothing here for an agency running several domains
- No public API documentation, changelog, status page or help centre. Support is an email address and a prompt to log in first
- No disclosure of which model writes the drafts or which data source feeds topic selection, which are the two things that determine what you are actually buying
Who it is for, and who should skip it
Worth it if
- You run a small B2B SaaS or product site with no writer and no SEO hire, and nothing is currently being published
- Your CMS is on the connector list and you want publishing automated rather than assisted
- You will put a real editor in front of the publish step regardless of what the marketing promises
- You want organic and AI-search visibility handled by one subscription rather than two
Skip it if
- You need to know the cost per published article before committing, which the credit model does not let you work out
- You are an agency or run several client domains, since there is one tier and no workspace model
- Your site already publishes well and the bottleneck is quality or authority rather than throughput
- You need a vendor with public docs, a changelog and a support channel you can reach without an account
Alternatives to Auspia
Each one answers when it is the better choice, which is the only thing a list of competitors is useful for.
- ClickRank Choose it when the site already has pages and the job is optimising and deploying on-page fixes over your own Search Console data rather than publishing new posts.
- WordRocket Choose it when you want generation volume at your own API cost with a human between the draft and the publish button, and a one-time licence instead of a subscription.
- Alli AI Choose it when the automation you need is on-page and technical changes across an existing site, not a content pipeline.
- Surfer Choose it when writers already produce the drafts and what is missing is scoring them against what ranks.
Sources and verification
Last verified 9 September 2026 0 days ago
Pricing 9 September 2026 Plans 9 September 2026 Features 9 September 2026 Platforms 9 September 2026 Company 9 September 2026
- Auspia pricing Pricing page verifies pricing, plans, limits checked 9 September 2026
- Auspia product workflow Official site verifies features checked 9 September 2026
- Auspia CMS publishing Official site verifies features, availability checked 9 September 2026
- Auspia AI search visibility Official site verifies features checked 9 September 2026
- Auspia extensions Official site verifies platforms checked 9 September 2026
- Auspia about Official site verifies company checked 9 September 2026
- Felo product list Official site verifies company checked 9 September 2026
Questions
How much does Auspia cost?
There is a free plan with 300 one-time credits, and one paid tier, Starter, at $99 a month with 8,000 credits refreshed each billing period, verified on the vendor's pricing page on 9 September 2026. Permanent credit packs are sold on top, but their prices are not shown on the public page. There is no annual discount and no tier above Starter.
Which CMS platforms does Auspia publish to?
WordPress, Webflow, Shopify, Ghost, Sanity, Emdash and a configurable API path, per the vendor's CMS publishing page on 9 September 2026. Auspia states that which of those are actually available depends on the connection you select, its configuration, your account state and the permissions granted to it, so treat the list as the ceiling rather than the guarantee.
Can you work out the cost per article?
Not from anything published. Auspia bills in credits and does not state how many credits an article costs, so the 8,000-credit Starter allowance cannot be converted into the 30-plus posts a month the home page advertises. That figure is the number to ask about before subscribing.
Is it safe to auto-publish AI articles at this volume?
It depends entirely on the review you add. Google's scaled content abuse policy targets large-volume generated content produced primarily to manipulate rankings, and a one-minute daily topic approval is not a review of what was written. Auspia's own product page says to use the workflow as decision support rather than a guarantee of results.
Who makes Auspia?
Felo Inc., a Tokyo company whose main product is the Felo AI search platform. Felo's own site lists Auspia as its SEO automation product. That is worth knowing because the customer logos on the Auspia home page lead with Felo's own products rather than independent brands.